Twice this month this has happened.

Content moderation on social media platforms like Facebook can sometimes result in unexpected restrictions, especially when it comes to images. Facebook’s Community Standards are designed to create a safe environment for all users, so they say, which includes strict rules against sharing content that could be considered sexually explicit or inappropriate. However, these systems are not definitely not perfect and may flag content that does not actually violate these standards.
If you believe your picture was mistakenly restricted, you can appeal the decision through Facebook’s review process. This process allows for human review of the automated system’s decisions, which can sometimes lead to a reversal of the restriction if the content is deemed appropriate. (waste of time)
For more information on Facebook’s Community Standards and the appeal process, you can visit their official community resources. It’s important to understand these guidelines to ensure that your content aligns with the platform’s policies and to avoid future restrictions. ( a waste of time)
If anyone can explain to me just how the above picture could be considered sexually inappropriate please comment below.
Street photography is a fascinating and rewarding genre of photography that captures candid moments of life in public spaces. However, street photography also poses some ethical challenges that require careful consideration and respect from the photographer. Here are some ethical issues for the street photographer to keep in mind:

Today I was going through my archive of pictures, in total about 12 TB stored, some of which I have never posted. Decided to work on some, maybe 20 and post them on my FB page. After posting I suddenly got a temporary ban for going against FB rules or community standards, whatever they may be as they don’t explain.





























These are selection of the images I posted, and as can clearly be seen there are no really suspect images so I can only surmise that it is the actual number of images that brought me foul of the ”LAW”. They fail to say how long I will have to suffer this ”temporary ban” so will have to wait and see.