Freelance photojournalism is rewarding but inherently risky

conflict, Lenses, nikon, opinons, thoughts, photography, Travel, war

Freelance photojournalism is rewarding but inherently risky: photographers face physical danger, legal exposure, digital threats, and long‑term psychological harm; mitigation requires training, insurance, local networks, and disciplined safety protocols.

Quick guide — key considerations, clarifying questions, decision points

  • Key considerations: personal safety, legal status, digital security, mental health, and financial protection.
  • Clarifying questions to answer for planning: Will you work alone or with a fixer; do you have hostile‑environment training and insurance; can you secure rapid evacuation and medical support?
  • Decision points: Choose assignments that match your training; invest in HEFAT (hostile environment and first aid), digital security, and reliable local contacts; decide acceptable risk vs reward before deployment.

Common dangers and what they mean

  • Physical harm and death. Photojournalists are exposed to gunfire, explosions, and crowd violence; historically, dozens of photographers have been killed while working in the field.
  • Kidnapping and detention. Freelancers lack institutional backing and can be targeted for ransom or political leverage; arrests may lead to long detentions without consular access.
  • Legal and bureaucratic risk. Working without correct visas, permits, or press accreditation can result in fines, equipment seizure, or deportation.
  • Equipment theft and loss. Cameras and lenses are high‑value and make you visible; losing gear can end a trip and create financial strain.
  • Digital threats. Unsecured devices and communications expose sources and material to surveillance, hacking, or evidence seizure.
  • Psychological trauma. Repeated exposure to violence and suffering increases risk of PTSD, depression, and burnout; trauma‑informed practices are essential.

Practical mitigation (what to do)

  • Training: Complete HEFAT and trauma‑informed safety courses; these teach risk assessment, emergency first aid, and psychological resilience.
  • Insurance and legal prep: Buy kidnap & ransom, medical evacuation, and equipment insurance; register with your embassy and carry legal documents.
  • Local networks: Hire vetted fixers and translators, coordinate with local journalists and NGOs, and establish check‑in protocols.
  • Digital hygiene: Use encrypted comms, full‑disk encryption, strong passwords, and secure backups; compartmentalise sensitive files.
  • Operational discipline: Wear low‑profile clothing, limit time in hotspots, plan exit routes, and avoid predictable patterns.
  • Aftercare: Build access to counselling and peer support; rotate out of high‑stress assignments to recover.

Risks, trade‑offs, and actionable steps

  • Risk: Training and insurance cost time and money; trade‑off: they dramatically reduce life‑threatening exposure and financial ruin. Action: budget safety into every assignment and refuse work beyond your training.
  • Risk: Working with fixers increases dependence and cost; trade‑off: they provide local knowledge and protection. Action: vet fixers through trusted networks and pay fairly.
  • Risk: Digital security can slow workflows; trade‑off: it protects sources and your material. Action: adopt simple, repeatable encryption and backup routines before deployment.

Bottom line: Freelance photojournalism demands more than courage—it requires preparation, training, and systems to protect your body, your sources, and your mind. Invest in safety before you chase the story.

Nikkor 85mm f/1.4G and 85mm f1.8G : a comparison

Lenses, nikon, opinons, thoughts, photography, street, Travel

Both lenses are excellent; the 85mm f/1.4G gives the smoothest bokeh and the shallowest depth of field, while the 85mm f/1.8G delivers nearly the same image quality for far less weight and cost—choose the f/1.4 for ultimate portrait look, the f/1.8 for value and portability.

Quick guide

  • Key considerations: bokeh quality, wide‑open sharpness, autofocus speed/noise, weight, and budget.
  • Clarifying questions: Do you shoot mostly tight portraits or environmental headshots? Do you need the absolute shallowest DOF or a lighter, quieter lens for long sessions?
  • Decision points: Pick 85mm f/1.4G if you prioritise creamy bokeh and maximum subject separation; pick 85mm f/1.8G if you want excellent optics, lower weight, and better value.

Comparison table

Attribute85mm f/1.8G85mm f/1.4G
Max aperturef/1.8f/1.4
Typical weightLighter; easy to carryHeavier; more substantial
BokehSmooth, very goodCreamier, more painterly
Sharpness (stopped down)ExcellentExcellent
AF speed/noiseFast and quiet (AF‑S)Good, depends on generation
Best useEveryday portraits, eventsHigh‑end portraits, editorial work

Optical performance

Sharpness: Both lenses become very sharp by f/2.8–f/4; the D800/D810 will reveal differences, so technique matters. Wide open the f/1.4G can deliver a softer, more painterly look that many portraitists prize, while the f/1.8G tends to be a touch crisper and more forgiving wide open. Bokeh and rendering: the f/1.4G generally produces smoother highlight roll‑off and creamier backgrounds, but the f/1.8G renders pleasing, natural separation at a fraction of the cost.

Autofocus, handling, and build

AF system: Both are AF‑S designs (built‑in motor) and work well on modern Nikon bodies; the f/1.8G is typically lighter and quieter, making it easier for long handheld sessions. Build and balance: the f/1.4G often feels more substantial and better balanced on larger bodies, which some photographers prefer for controlled portrait work.

Price, value, and real‑world use

Cost vs benefit: The f/1.4G commands a premium for its shallow DOF and build; the f/1.8G is widely praised as an excellent value that covers 90–95% of real‑world portrait needs. For event shooters or photographers who carry a kit all day, the f/1.8G often wins on practicality and ROI.

Risks, trade‑offs, and actionable steps

  • Risk: Buying the f/1.4G for its shallow DOF can lead to missed shots due to narrow focus; Action: practice precise focus, use single‑point AF or back‑button AF, and stop down when needed.
  • Trade‑off: Heavier kit vs subtle image nuance; Action: rent or test both on your body to judge real differences in your workflow.
  • Budget risk: Paying for marginal gains; Action: if you shoot long sessions or need portability, favour the f/1.8G for the best cost‑to‑performance ratio.

Recommendation

If you want the ultimate portrait look and can live with extra weight and cost, choose the 85mm f/1.4G. If you want nearly identical image quality with lower weight and much better value, choose the 85mm f/1.8G.

The Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D + Nikon D800

cameras, Lenses, photography, opinons, thoughts, street, nikon

The Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D is a very good match for the Nikon D800 when you value classic rendering and character; it autofocuses on the D800 (screw‑drive), gives pleasing bokeh and micro‑contrast, and performs best when stopped to f/2f/2f/4f/4for critical work.

Quick guide

  • Key considerations: Autofocus type (AF‑D screw‑drive), wide‑open rendering vs stopped‑down sharpness, chromatic aberration and vignetting on a high‑resolution sensor.
  • Clarifying questions to answer for yourself: Do you need silent/fast AF (AF‑S) or are you keeping the D‑series look? Will you prioritise center sharpness or the lens’s organic character?
  • Decision points: Keep the 50/1.4D for its look and price, or upgrade to an AF‑S 50/1.4G if you need faster/quieter AF.

Compatibility and performance

Autofocus compatibility: The 50mm f/1.4D is an AF‑D lens that uses the camera’s screw‑drive motor; the D800 supports this, so the lens will autofocus on your body. Optical character: on a high‑resolution body like the D800 the lens’s film‑era rendering becomes more apparent — softness and aberrations at f/1.4f/1.4 are common, but sharpness improves markedly by f/2f/2and is strong by f/2.8f/2.8, especially in the center. Real‑world user reports praise its look but note focus quirks and the need for careful technique on high‑MP bodies.

Practical tips and workflow

  • Focus technique: Use single‑point AF or back‑button AF and place the point on the subject’s eye; at f/1.4f/1.4 depth of field is very thin, so precise focus is essential.
  • Aperture strategy: Use f/1.4–f/2 for subject isolation and low light; f/2.8–f/4 for portraits and editorial crops where edge performance matters.
  • AF fine‑tune: Run an AF fine‑tune calibration on the D800 if you notice consistent front/back focus; many D800 users report improved results after calibration.
  • RAW workflow: Shoot RAW, apply targeted chromatic aberration correction and mild sharpening; accept or embrace some vignetting as part of the lens’s character.
  • Support and technique: For critical high‑resolution output, use a steady hand, higher shutter speeds, or a tripod to match the D800’s resolving power.

Risks trade‑offs and actionable steps

  • Trade‑offs: You trade AF speed and silence for character and cost; the AF‑D’s screw‑drive is noisier/slower than AF‑S alternatives. The D800 magnifies lens flaws (CA, corner softness, vignetting).
  • Actionable steps:
    1. Calibrate AF on the D800 and test at multiple apertures to find the sweet spot.
    2. Stop down to f/2.8f/2.8f/4f/4 for edge‑to‑edge sharpness when needed.
    3. Shoot RAW and apply selective CA correction and denoise in post.
    4. Consider AF‑S 50/1.4G only if you need faster, quieter AF and slightly improved optical control.

Closing

If you value classic rendering, micro‑contrast, and cost‑to‑performance, the Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D is an excellent, characterful lens on the D800 — provided you use careful focus technique, stop down when necessary, and apply a disciplined RAW workflow. For lab tests and long‑term user impressions, see community discussions and reviews that document both the lens’s charm and its practical limits.

Nikon D800 + Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G: Why this pairing works

cameras, Lenses, nikon, opinons, thoughts, photography, street

Sensor and lens synergy

The D800’s high‑resolution full‑frame sensor magnifies the optical character of whatever glass you mount on it. A well‑resolved prime like the 85mm f/1.8G shows its strengths here: fine detail, strong micro‑contrast, and smooth out‑of‑focus rendering. The lens is sharp wide open, and the D800 gives you the headroom to crop or print large without losing detail.

What the 85mm brings to street work

  • Compression and subject separation — the 85mm compresses background elements, making subjects pop while keeping context readable.
  • Fast aperture — at f/1.8 you get shallow depth of field for portraits and low‑light capability for evening street scenes.
  • Compact and light — easier to carry than heavier 85mm f/1.4 options, so it fits a street kit without weighing you down.
  • Affordable performance — excellent value for the image quality it delivers on a high‑resolution body.

Practical setups and use cases

Daytime street portrait kit

  • Body: D800
  • Lens: Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G
  • Settings: Aperture priority around f/2f/2f/2.8f/2.8; shutter speed 1/250\geq 1/250 for handheld; ISO as low as practical for clean files.
  • Why: Fast enough for subject isolation while keeping enough depth for expressive environmental portraits.

Low‑light and night scenes

  • Body: D3S or D800 (D3S if extreme ISO needed)
  • Lens: 85mm f/1.8G wide open
  • Settings: Manual or aperture priority at f/1.8f/1.8; shutter speed 1/125\geq 1/125 for single subjects; raise ISO as needed and embrace grain on older bodies.
  • Why: The 85mm’s aperture plus the D800’s resolution lets you retain detail even when pushing ISO; on the D3S you gain cleaner high‑ISO files.

Editorial and high‑detail work

  • Body: D800 or D810
  • Lens: 85mm f/1.8G stopped to f/4f/4f/5.6f/5.6 for maximum sharpness across the frame
  • Why: Use the D800/D810’s resolution to capture textures and expressions for prints or tight crops; stop down slightly for edge‑to‑edge clarity.

Shooting tips to get the most from the combo

  • Nail focus technique — at f/1.8f/1.8 depth of field is thin; place your focus point on the subject’s eye and use single‑point AF or back‑button AF for control.
  • Mind your distance — 85mm requires stepping back compared with 35/50mm; use that distance to create natural, unposed expressions.
  • Use the compression — position background elements deliberately; the 85mm will compress them into pleasing layers behind your subject.
  • Stop down when needed — for groups or environmental portraits, move to f/4f/4f/5.6f/5.6 to keep more in focus while retaining the lens’s character.
  • Leverage the D800’s files — shoot RAW, apply careful sharpening and selective noise reduction, and preserve the lens’s micro‑contrast in post.

How this pairing fits your Nikon lineup

  • Compared with D300S/D700/D3S: The D800 + 85mm is the high‑detail, editorial option in your kit. Use it when you want large prints, tight crops, or a different look from your 35/50/85 primes on smaller bodies.
  • Compared with D800 + other primes: The 85mm is more portrait‑centric than a 35mm or 50mm; it’s less versatile for wide environmental street shots but excels at intimate portraits and compressed street scenes.
  • Workflow note: The D800’s files are large—keep a disciplined RAW workflow and back up originals; consistent editing preserves the lens‑and‑body character across a series.

Final thought

If you prize subject isolation, flattering compression, and high‑resolution detail, the D800 + Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G is a superb pairing. It asks you to compose with intention, focus precisely, and use distance as a creative tool—exactly the kind of discipline that older, characterful Nikon bodies reward.

Rediscovering Nikon DSLRs That Still Deliver

Lenses, Travel, pictures, photography, opinons, thoughts, street, nikon

Quick guide and decisions to make

  • Key considerations: Do you prioritise resolution and cropping or low‑light headroom and tactile handling?
  • Clarifying questions to frame the post: Which primes do you favour; do you shoot more daylight or night street work; is portability or ruggedness more important?
  • Decision points for readers: Choose a primary body for the job (high resolution vs low light), keep a consistent RAW workflow, and match prime focal lengths to your shooting style.

Why these bodies matter

  • Nikon D810 delivers 36.3MP full‑frame resolution and a wide ISO range, making it ideal when detail and cropping latitude matter.
  • Nikon D300S is a rugged DX workhorse with 12.3MP, weather sealing, and reliable handling—built for deliberate street work.
  • Nikon D700 brought full‑frame ergonomics and low‑noise files in a compact body, with ~12MP that many still prize for tonality and handling.
  • Nikon D800 introduced 36MP full‑frame resolution that rewards sharp glass and careful technique.
  • Nikon D3S remains a low‑light specialist with exceptional high‑ISO performance and professional durability.

Lenses and setups

  • Core approach: Use high‑quality primes; the glass defines look more than megapixels.
  • Recommended focal lengths: 35mm for context; 50mm for natural perspective; 85mm for portraits and distance; use short tele on the D800/D810 for tight editorial crops.
  • Sample kits: D300S + 35mm f/1.8 for light, fast street; D3S + 50mm/85mm f/1.4 for night; D800/D810 + premium primes for high‑detail work.

How limitations shape style

  • Lower megapixel bodies encourage decisive composition and embrace of grain as aesthetic.
  • High‑resolution bodies change your workflow: sharper technique, steadier support, and premium glass become essential.
  • Low‑light specialists let you capture moments others miss, expanding creative possibilities after dark.

Practical tips and workflow

  • Expose for highlights and protect midtones on older sensors; shoot RAW and apply selective noise reduction.
  • Keep ISO conservative on D300S/D700; use D3S for high‑ISO freedom.
  • Maintain lens care and a consistent edit style to preserve camera character.
  • Let lenses lead: prime rendering, micro‑contrast, and bokeh shape the final image more than sensor specs.

Risks trade‑offs and actionable steps

  • Trade‑offs: Older bodies lack modern conveniences (Wi‑Fi, fastest AF, greatest dynamic range). Action: pick one body as your daily driver and a second as a specialist to avoid workflow fragmentation.
  • Noise and recovery limits: Older sensors have less headroom. Action: expose carefully, bracket when possible, and use modern denoise tools selectively.
  • Value vs needs: If you need cutting‑edge AF or extreme high ISO, consider supplementing with a modern body; otherwise, invest in sharp primes and technique.

Closing thought Paired with high‑quality primes, the D300S, D700, D800, D3S, and D810 form a versatile, characterful system that rewards intentional seeing: the lenses you choose and the way you shoot will define your voice more than the newest sensor.

Rediscovering the Nikon D300S: A Street Photographer’s Companion

cambodia, cameras, Lenses, nikon, opinons, thoughts, photography, street

In an age of mirrorless marvels and AI-enhanced sensors, the Nikon D300S might seem like a relic. Released in 2009, it’s a camera that many would now label “obsolete.” But for those who know how to see, this DSLR still delivers—especially in the realm of street photography.

📸 Why the D300S Still Matters

  • Build Quality: Magnesium alloy body, weather-sealed, and rugged enough to handle the unpredictability of the street.
  • Ergonomics: Comfortable grip, intuitive button layout, and a responsive shutter—everything you need for fast, instinctive shooting.
  • Image Quality: The 12.3MP DX-format sensor may not win spec wars, but it produces files with character, especially when paired with classic Nikon glass.
  • Dual Card Slots: CF and SD—perfect for redundancy or separating RAW and JPEG workflows.

🏙️ Street Photography with the D300S

Using the D300S on the street is a tactile experience. It forces you to slow down, observe, and anticipate. Autofocus is reliable, though not lightning-fast, which encourages deliberate framing. The camera’s weight adds stability, and its shutter sound—distinct but not intrusive—feels like a handshake with the moment.

⚙️ Limitations That Shape Style

  • Low-Light Performance: ISO 1600 is usable, but beyond that, noise creeps in. This limitation nudges you toward natural light and shadow play.
  • No Wi-Fi or Live View: You’re not chimping or sharing instantly. You’re shooting for the edit, not the algorithm.
  • Fixed Screen: No tilting or flipping—just commit to the angle and shoot.

✨ The Joy of the “Obsolete”

There’s a quiet rebellion in using older gear. It’s a rejection of the upgrade treadmill and a return to intentional photography. The D300S doesn’t flatter—it reveals. It doesn’t automate—it asks you to engage.

In a world chasing megapixels and mirrorless speed, the Nikon D300S reminds us that good results come from good seeing. And sometimes, the best camera is the one that makes you feel like a photographer again.

Chip Mong 271 Mega Mall

cambodia, opinons, thoughts, photography, public, Travel

Chip Mong 271 Mega Mall is one of Phnom Penh’s largest and newest shopping complexes, opened in September 2022 along Street 271. It offers a mix of international and local brands, dining, entertainment, and leisure facilities, making it a major lifestyle destination in Cambodia’s capital.

📌 Key Details

  • Location: Yothapol Khemarak Phoumin Blvd (Street 271), Chak Angre Leu, Khan Mean Chey, Phnom Penh. Roughly 7 km from Wat Phnom.
  • Opening: Soft opening on 12 September 2022.
  • Size: Covers 160,000 m² total area with 58,000 m² of leasable retail space.
  • Parking: Capacity for 1,970 cars and 540 motorbikes.
  • Facilities:
    • 4 floors of retail outlets
    • International and local fashion brands
    • Food court and restaurants
    • Movie theatre
    • Cafés, souvenir shops, and convenience stores

✨ Why It Matters

  • Lifestyle hub: Designed around the theme of “Everyday Discovery”, the mall combines shopping, dining, and entertainment in one space.
  • Economic impact: Represents Chip Mong Group’s expansion into large‑scale retail, boosting Phnom Penh’s modern consumer infrastructure.
  • Accessibility: Easy to reach without crossing rivers or requiring special transport; direct parking available.

⚠️ Considerations

  • Competition: It joins other mega malls like AEON Mall Phnom Penh, intensifying competition in Cambodia’s retail sector.
  • Traffic: Located on a busy boulevard, congestion can be an issue during peak hours.
  • Cultural shift: Reflects Cambodia’s rapid urbanisation and changing consumer habits, but may overshadow traditional markets.

✅ Summary

Chip Mong 271 Mega Mall is a landmark retail and leisure destination in Phnom Penh, offering scale, convenience, and modern amenities. For residents and visitors, it’s both a shopping centre and a symbol of Cambodia’s evolving urban lifestyle.

Thailands use of Airpower ??

cambodia, opinons, thoughts, photography, war

Thailand’s use of airpower against Cambodia is widely seen as disproportionate and controversial. Thailand argues it is acting in self‑defence after border incidents, but Cambodia and international observers stress that Cambodia has no comparable air force, making the strikes an escalation that risks civilian lives and cultural heritage.

📌 Thailand’s Justification

  • Thai officials claim the airstrikes are defensive, launched after Cambodian forces allegedly planted landmines and attacked Thai positions.
  • The Thai Prime Minister stated operations would continue “as necessary to defend the country and protect public safety”.
  • Bangkok frames the strikes as part of protecting the Gulf of Thailand and securing disputed border zones.

⚠️ Criticism and Concerns

  • Cambodia’s position: Phnom Penh accuses Thailand of aggression, saying the strikes deliberately hit civilian areas, including shelters for displaced people and infrastructure in Siem Reap province.
  • Civilian casualties: Reports confirm at least five civilians killed in early strikes, with the toll rising to around 20–25 overall.
  • Imbalance of power: Cambodia has no modern airpower, relying on ground forces, making Thailand’s use of fighter jets a one‑sided escalation.
  • International reaction: Observers warn the strikes undermine ceasefire efforts and risk turning border clashes into full‑scale war.

✨ Assessment

  • Legally and ethically, Thailand’s justification is contested. While states have the right to self‑defence, the scale and targets of the airstrikes—deep inside Cambodian territory, near civilian shelters and UNESCO heritage sites—raise serious proportionality concerns.
  • Strategically, airpower gives Thailand overwhelming dominance, but it risks international condemnation and long‑term instability.
  • Humanitarian impact: With over 800,000 Cambodians displaced, the strikes worsen a crisis that already threatens regional stability.

🔮 Outlook

Unless mediated by ASEAN or external powers, Thailand’s reliance on airpower is likely to prolong the conflict. Cambodia cannot respond in kind, meaning the imbalance will continue to fuel accusations of unjustified aggression.

Cambodia / Thailand conflict.

pictures, photography, opinons, thoughts, cambodia, war, homelessness

Yes, fighting between Thailand and Cambodia has escalated sharply in December 2025, with Thai airstrikes hitting deep inside Cambodian territory, including Siem Reap province near Angkor Wat. Cambodia accuses Thailand of targeting civilian areas and shelters for displaced people, while Thailand claims self‑defence in a long‑running border dispute. Casualties, displacement, and damage to infrastructure are mounting.

📌 Current Situation (as of mid‑December 2025)

  • Airstrikes reported: Cambodian officials say Thai F‑16 fighter jets dropped bombs in Oddar Meanchey and Siem Reap provinces, including near camps for displaced people and a bridge in Srei Snam district.
  • Tourist sites at risk: Siem Reap, home to Angkor Wat, Cambodia’s top tourist draw and a UNESCO World Heritage site, has been directly threatened by strikes.
  • Casualties & displacement: At least 20 people have been killed since fighting reignited, with hundreds of thousands displaced. Cambodia claims around 800,000 people have fled border areasThe Straits Times.
  • Border closures: Phnom Penh has shut all land crossings with Thailand to protect civilians.
  • Thai perspective: Bangkok says the strikes are defensive, part of operations to protect the Gulf of Thailand, and blames Cambodia for instigating attacks.

⚠️ Risks and Implications

  • Humanitarian crisis: Camps for displaced people are now under threat, worsening conditions for civilians already uprooted.
  • Tourism impact: Cambodia’s economy relies heavily on tourism, and strikes near Angkor Wat could devastate recovery efforts post‑COVID.
  • Regional instability: The conflict stems from colonial‑era border demarcation disputes, and repeated truces have failed.
  • International concern: Despite calls for a ceasefire—including from the US—bombing has continued, raising fears of escalation.

✨ Assessment

The Thailand–Cambodia border conflict has reignited into one of the most serious flare‑ups in years. The use of airstrikes deep inside Cambodian territory marks a dangerous escalation, threatening civilians, cultural heritage sites, and regional stability. Cambodia is militarily outgunned, relying on international pressure and diplomacy, while Thailand frames its actions as defensive.

In 2025, this conflict is not just about disputed territory—it is about national identity, economic survival, and the fragility of peace in Southeast Asia. The risk of further escalation remains high unless external mediation succeeds.

Reports from mid‑December 2025 confirm that Thai airstrikes have reached Siem Reap province itself, not just the border.

  • Targets hit: Cambodian officials say bombs struck Srei Snam district in Siem Reap, damaging a bridge and hitting areas near shelters for displaced people.
  • Proximity to Angkor Wat: While Angkor Wat itself has not been directly attacked, the strikes are within the same province, raising fears that Cambodia’s most important cultural and tourist site could be at risk.
  • Civilian impact: Camps for displaced people in Siem Reap province have been threatened, with Cambodia warning that tourist hotspots are now in danger.
  • Depth of strikes: This marks a significant escalation—airstrikes are no longer confined to border areas like Oddar Meanchey, but are penetrating deep into Cambodian territory, roughly 100 km from the Thai border.

At least 20 Cambodians have been reported killed in the renewed border clashes and Thai airstrikes since early December 2025, with hundreds of thousands displaced.

📌 Current Death Toll

  • Initial clashes (Dec 8–9, 2025): Reports confirmed around 10 deaths as fighting spread to new parts of the border.
  • Escalation (Dec 11–15, 2025): Heavy airstrikes and artillery attacks pushed the toll higher, with about two dozen killed in total.
  • Cambodian civilians: Casualties include civilians near shelters and bridges in Siem Reap province, as well as soldiers along the border.

⚠️ Humanitarian Impact

  • Displacement: Cambodia says over 800,000 people have fled border provinces, with camps now under threat from bombing.
  • Infrastructure damage: Bridges, shelters, and areas near Siem Reap have been hit, raising fears for Angkor Wat and tourism.
  • Civilian risk: Airstrikes penetrating deep into Cambodian territory mean non‑combatants are increasingly at risk.

✨ Assessment

The death toll in Cambodia stands at roughly 20–25 people as of mid‑December 2025, but numbers are likely to rise as fighting continues. The scale of displacement is far larger, creating a humanitarian crisis that threatens both civilian safety and Cambodia’s economic lifeline in Siem Reap.

🔺 Three Lenses, Three Ways of Seeing

Lenses, nikon, opinons, thoughts, photography, pictures, street, Travel

A philosophy in glass and focus

I don’t choose lenses for coverage. I choose them for character. Each one speaks differently. Each one sees differently. Together, they form a triangle — not of focal lengths, but of editorial stance.

📍 Clarity — NIKKOR 50mm f/1.8G

This is the lens I reach for when I want truth without embellishment. It’s sharp, democratic, unpretentious. It doesn’t romanticize the street — it respects it. In Phnom Penh’s quieter corners, it sees what’s there and lets it speak. No blur, no drama. Just presence.

🌫️ Atmosphere — NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G

This one is softer. Wide open, it breathes. It doesn’t chase sharpness — it leans into ambiguity. I use it when I want mood over detail, when the story lives in the shadows. It’s the lens of dusk, of memory, of things half‑said.

🎯 Focus — NIKKOR 85mm f/1.8D / f/1.8G

These are my scalpels. They isolate. They clarify. The D version has grit — mechanical, tactile, full of history. The G version is quiet, refined, surgical. Both let me pull a face from the crowd, a gesture from the blur. They’re not just portrait lenses. They’re editorial tools for saying: this is what matters.



🧭 The Triangle

Clarity. Atmosphere. Focus. I move between them depending on the story. Sometimes I need the sharpness of truth. Sometimes I need the softness of ambiguity. Sometimes I need to isolate a moment and hold it still.

This triangle isn’t about gear. It’s about ethics. It’s about how I choose to see.