Shooting in RAW — A Practical Guide

cameras, film, opinons, thoughts, photography, street, Travel

Shooting in RAW means saving the sensor’s unprocessed data so you can shape the final image later. RAW files act like a digital negative: they keep maximum detail, tone, and color information that in-camera JPEG processing would otherwise compress or discard.

What RAW actually contains

  • RAW stores linear sensor data with higher bit depth than JPEG, preserving more tonal steps between shadows and highlights. This gives you extra headroom when correcting exposure, recovering highlights, or pulling detail from shadows.

Advantages of shooting RAW

  • Greater dynamic range and recovery — You can recover more detail from highlights and shadows because RAW keeps more tonal information.
  • Flexible white balance — White balance is not baked into the pixel data the way it is for JPEGs, so you can change it non-destructively in post.
  • Superior colour depth and grading — Higher bit depth means smoother gradients and more room for colour grading without banding.
  • Non‑destructive edits — RAW editing writes instructions instead of permanently changing pixels, so you can always revert to the original capture.
  • Better noise handling — RAW processors can apply more sophisticated noise reduction because they have access to the sensor’s full data.
  • More control for critical workflows — Commercial, landscape, and fine-art work benefits from the latitude RAW offers for exacting color and tone control.

Disadvantages of shooting RAW

  • Larger file sizes — RAW files are significantly bigger than JPEGs, which increases storage needs and backup complexity.
  • Slower workflow — RAW requires post-processing, which adds time to editing and delivery compared with straight-out-of-camera JPEGs.
  • Compatibility and portability — RAW formats vary by camera brand and model; some software or older devices may not read every RAW without updates or converters.
  • Longer write times and smaller burst buffers — On some cameras, RAW capture can slow burst rate or fill buffers faster than JPEGs, affecting action shooting.
  • Need for consistent color management — RAW gives flexibility but demands disciplined color pipelines (calibrated monitor, managed profiles) to get reliable outputs.

When to choose RAW vs JPEG

  • Shoot RAW when: you need maximum image quality, plan heavy editing, require reliable highlight/shadow recovery, or are producing work for clients or prints.
  • Shoot JPEG when: you need instant turnaround, extreme file economy (long events with limited cards), or when images are destined only for quick social sharing with minimal editing.

Practical workflow tips

  • Use RAW+JPEG if you sometimes need immediate, shareable files but still want RAW for archives and editing.
  • Cull JPEG previews to speed selection; reserve RAW for final edits.
  • Invest in fast, large-capacity memory cards and a reliable backup routine to handle RAW volumes.
  • Create camera-specific presets or base edits to speed RAW processing while keeping non‑destructive flexibility.
  • Keep your RAW converters updated and standardize on one or two tools (Lightroom, Capture One, or your camera maker’s software) to ensure consistent color and metadata handling.

Short checklist before you shoot

  • Do you need maximum dynamic range and color control? → RAW.
  • Do you need immediate delivery with no editing? → JPEG or RAW+JPEG.
  • Do you have storage and backup planned? → If yes, RAW is safe; if not, plan for it before shooting large volumes.

Shooting RAW is about trading convenience for control. If your work values tonal fidelity, color precision, and future-proof archives, RAW is usually worth the extra planning and processing time.

📷 When the Picture Is Good, Does Gear Matter?

cameras, film, Fujichrome, fujifilm, Lenses, opinons, thoughts, photography, pictures, street, Travel, viltrox

A Deeper Exploration of Vision, Tools, and the Weight of Story

In essence: If a picture is truly good—if it resonates emotionally, tells a story, or lingers in memory—most viewers don’t care what camera or lens was used. But the conversation is richer than that: gear doesn’t determine meaning, yet it shapes possibility. The real artistry lies in how vision and tools meet.

The phrase “If the picture is good, nobody cares what camera it was taken with” has become a kind of mantra in photography circles. It’s both liberating and provocative. On one hand, it frees us from the consumerist treadmill of chasing specs. On the other, it risks oversimplifying the relationship between vision and tools. Let’s expand the discussion.

🧠 Why the Statement Rings True

  • Emotional impact trumps technical trivia. A photograph that moves people—whether it’s a war image, a street portrait, or a tender family moment—doesn’t invite questions about megapixels. It invites reflection.
  • History proves it. Iconic images were made with cameras that, by today’s standards, are technically limited. Yet Robert Capa’s blurred D-Day frames or Dorothea Lange’s Migrant Mother remain unforgettable.
  • Viewers don’t see metadata. In galleries, books, or newsprint, the story and composition dominate. The EXIF data is invisible.

⚙️ Where Gear Still Matters

  • Technical limits shape style. A slow lens forces you into bright light; a wide prime teaches you to step closer; a noisy sensor nudges you toward grainy aesthetics. Gear doesn’t dictate vision, but it channels it.
  • Reliability is invisible until it fails. A weather-sealed body or dependable autofocus can mean the difference between capturing a fleeting moment and missing it.
  • Certain genres demand certain tools. Sports, wildlife, and astrophotography often require specialised lenses and sensors. Without them, the image simply isn’t possible.

As Roger Clark notes in his analysis of gear’s role, “A skilled photographer can achieve great results with any camera, but not just any kind of photo”. The right tool expands what’s possible, even if it doesn’t define the artistry.

🪞 The Deeper Lesson

The real wisdom in the phrase is about prioritisation:

  • Vision first. What do you want to say? What story are you telling?
  • Process second. How do you approach light, timing, and presence?
  • Tools last. Which camera or lens best supports that vision and process?

Gear is the brush, not the painting. The stethoscope, not the diagnosis. The pen, not the poem. It matters, but it’s not the heart.

🖼 In Practice

For educators and documentarians, this principle is liberating:

  • It encourages people to trust their eyes rather than chase gear.
  • It models creative restraint—using one lens, one body, and learning its rhythm.
  • It re-frames gear as a partner in process, not a shortcut to artistry.

🧭 Final Thought

Yes, if a picture is good, nobody cares what lens or camera it was taken with. But the paradox is this: the right gear, chosen with intention, can help you get to that “good” picture more reliably. The danger lies in mistaking the tool for the vision.

In the end, the photographs that endure are remembered not for the equipment behind them, but for the humanity within them.

The exposure triangle

cameras, film, Fujichrome, fujifilm, Lenses, opinons, thoughts, photography, pictures, processing, street, Travel

1. Aperture

2. Shutter Speed

3. ISO

My thoughts on Street Photography.

cambodia, cameras, film, Fujichrome, fujifilm, homelessness, Lenses, Lowepro, opinons, thoughts, photography, pictures, processing

The Art of Photography: Crafting the Perfect Picture

film, fujifilm, homelessness, Lenses, Lowepro, opinons, thoughts, pictures, processing, street, Travel

The Artistic Charm of Black and White: Embracing the Monochrome Palette

cambodia, cameras, film, fujifilm, homelessness, Lowepro, opinons, thoughts, photography, processing, street, Travel, war

The Great DSLR vs. Mirrorless Debate: A Humorous Take on a Photographer’s Dilemma

film, Fujichrome, fujifilm, Lowepro, opinons, thoughts, photography, pictures, processing, street, Travel, viltrox
Nikon D3S
Fuji XT3

The true magic of photography

cambodia, cameras, film, Fujichrome, fujifilm, opinons, thoughts, photography, pictures, printers, street, Travel, voluntary, war

Fanboys and Fujifilm

cambodia, cameras, film, Fujichrome, fujifilm, opinons, thoughts, photography, pictures, street, Travel

Hello, fellow photography enthusiasts! Today, I want to talk about a phenomenon that has been sweeping the photography world for the last few years: the Fujifilm craze and fanboys.

You know what I’m talking about. Those people who swear by their Fujifilm cameras and lenses, who rave about the colours, the ergonomics, the film simulations, the retro design, and the overall experience of shooting with Fuji. They are everywhere: on social media, on forums, on YouTube, on blogs, and even in real life. They are passionate, loyal, and sometimes a bit defensive. They are the Fuji FanBoys (and girls).

Now, before you accuse me of being a hater or a troll, let me make one thing clear: I have nothing against Fujifilm or its users. In fact, I own a Fujifilm X-T3 myself and a few other Fuji cameras and lenses, and I love them. It’s a great camera that delivers excellent image quality, performance, and usability. It’s fun to use and it inspires me to be creative. I also appreciate Fujifilm’s dedication to innovation and customer service. They are constantly updating their firmware, adding new features and improving existing ones. They also listen to feedback and suggestions from their users and implement them in their products.

So why am I writing this blog post? Well, because I think there is a difference between being a fan and being a fanboy/girl. A fan is someone who likes something and enjoys it. A fanboy/girl is someone who likes something and thinks it’s the best thing ever. A fan is open-minded and respectful of other opinions. A fanboy/girl is closed-minded and dismissive of other perspectives. A fan is willing to admit flaws and limitations. A fanboy is blind to faults and exaggerations.

Don’t get me wrong: there is nothing wrong with being enthusiastic about something you love. But when that enthusiasm turns into obsession, bias, or arrogance, then it becomes a problem. And that’s what I see happening with some of the Fuji FanBoys out there. They are so obsessed with their Fujifilm gear that they can’t see anything else. They are so biased that they ignore or downplay the advantages of other brands or systems. They are so arrogant that they mock or insult anyone who dares to disagree with them or choose something different.

This kind of behaviour is not only annoying but also harmful. It creates unnecessary division and hostility among photographers who should be united by their passion for the art and craft of photography. It also limits one’s own growth and learning as a photographer by shutting out other possibilities and perspectives. And it ultimately undermines one’s credibility and reputation as a photographer by making one look like a fanatic or a shill.

So what can we do about this? Well, first of all, we can be more aware of our own biases and preferences. We can acknowledge that we like Fujifilm for certain reasons, but that doesn’t mean that Fujifilm is perfect or superior to everything else. We can recognize that other brands and systems have their own strengths and weaknesses and that they may suit different needs and tastes better than Fujifilm. We can respect other people’s choices and opinions, even if they differ from ours.

Secondly, we can be more curious and open-minded about other options and opportunities. We can try out different cameras and lenses from different brands and systems, either by renting them, borrowing them from friends, or visiting a store. We can learn from other photographers who use different gear than us, either by reading their reviews, watching their videos, or following their work. We can experiment with different styles and genres of photography that may challenge us or inspire us.

Thirdly, we can be more humble and honest about our own skills and abilities. We can admit that we are not experts or masters of photography just because we use Fujifilm gear. We can acknowledge that we still have a lot to learn and improve as photographers, regardless of what camera or lens we use. We can focus more on our vision and creativity than on our gear and specs.

In conclusion, I want to say that I’m not trying to bash or offend anyone who loves Fujifilm gear. I’m just trying to share my perspective on how we can be better photographers and better people by being more balanced and reasonable in our fandom. I hope you enjoyed reading this blog post and found it useful or interesting. If you agree or disagree with me, feel free to leave a comment below or send me an email. I’d love to hear your thoughts on this topic.

Until next time.

Fujifilm JPEGS are not just ordinary JPEGS, they are works of art!

film, Fujichrome, fujifilm, opinons, thoughts, photography, street, Travel

Fujifilm JPEGS are amazing! They have a unique look and feel that many photographers love. They are rich in colours, contrast and detail, and they capture the mood and atmosphere of the scene very well. For example, you can use the Classic Chrome film simulation to create a vintage and cinematic look, or the Velvia film simulation to enhance the vibrancy and saturation of your landscapes. Fujifilm JPEGS are so good because they use proprietary film simulations that emulate the characteristics of different types of film. These film simulations are based on decades of experience and research by Fujifilm, and they give the JPEGS a distinctive and artistic touch. Fujifilm JPEGS are also very versatile and customizable. You can adjust various settings such as sharpness, noise reduction, highlight tone, shadow tone, colour and white balance to fine-tune your JPEGS to your liking. You can also apply different film simulations to the same image to create different effects. For instance, you can switch from Provia to Acros to turn your colour image into a stunning black and white one, or from Astia to Eterna to change the mood from soft and gentle to dramatic and intense. Fujifilm JPEGS are a great option for those who want to save time and storage space, or who prefer to get their images right in the camera without much post-processing. They are also fun and inspiring to use, as they encourage you to experiment with different styles and moods. Fujifilm JPEGS are not just ordinary JPEGS, they are works of art!

I love the Fujifilm Provia film simulation so much! It gives me such vibrant and realistic colours in my photos. It’s my go-to choice for most situations. The only other film simulation that comes close is chrome, which has a nice contrast and saturation. But Provia is still my favourite by far!