news

🌍 Why They Come: The Volunteers of Kids International Dental Services

cambodia, opinons, thoughts, Travel, voluntary

I. A Call Beyond Borders

Every year, dentists, dental students, and young adults pack their bags and travel thousands of miles to join Kids International Dental Services (KIDS) missions. They arrive in Cambodia, the Philippines, or other underserved regions not for profit, but for purpose.

The question is simple: why do they come? The answer is layered — a mix of compassion, professional growth, and the search for meaning.

II. Compassion in Action

For many volunteers, the motivation begins with empathy. They know that untreated dental pain can rob a child of sleep, appetite, and education.

  • Immediate impact: A single extraction can end months of suffering.
  • Visible change: Volunteers witness children smile freely for the first time in years.
  • Human connection: Holding a child’s hand during treatment, they feel the bond of shared humanity.

As one volunteer explained: “Dental pain steals childhood. If I can give back even one night of peaceful sleep, it’s worth everything.”

III. Professional Growth

KIDS missions are also a proving ground for young professionals.

  • Hands‑on experience: Dental students gain practical skills in challenging environments.
  • Adaptability: Working without the comforts of modern clinics teaches resilience and creativity.
  • Mentorship: Experienced dentists guide students, creating a cycle of service that continues long after the mission ends.

For many, these missions shape their careers. They return home not just as better clinicians, but as advocates for global health.

IV. The Search for Meaning

Beyond skill and service, volunteers often describe a deeper pull.

  • Perspective: Witnessing poverty and resilience reframes their own lives.
  • Purpose: Missions remind them why they chose dentistry — not just to treat teeth, but to care for people.
  • Community: Volunteers form bonds with each other, united by shared challenges and triumphs.

The experience becomes more than a trip; it becomes a chapter in their personal story of meaning and responsibility.

V. Challenges They Embrace

Volunteers face long days, relentless heat, and limited resources. Yet these challenges are part of the appeal.

  • They learn to improvise when equipment falters.
  • They discover patience when children are afraid.
  • They find joy in small victories — a child’s laughter, a parent’s gratitude, a smile restored.

VI. Why They Keep Coming Back

Many volunteers return year after year. They speak of unfinished work, of children they want to see again, of communities that feel like family.

KIDS missions are not just about dentistry. They are about dignity, education, and hope. Volunteers come because they believe in those values — and because they see them come alive in every courtyard clinic, every classroom turned into a dental station, every child who walks home pain‑free.

✨ Conclusion

The volunteers of Kids International Dental Services come for compassion, for growth, and for meaning. They leave with stories, skills, and a renewed sense of purpose.

In Cambodia and beyond, their presence is proof that service is not just about what you give — it’s about what you discover when you step into someone else’s world, hold their hand, and help them smile again.

Thailands use of Airpower ??

cambodia, opinons, thoughts, photography, war

Thailand’s use of airpower against Cambodia is widely seen as disproportionate and controversial. Thailand argues it is acting in self‑defence after border incidents, but Cambodia and international observers stress that Cambodia has no comparable air force, making the strikes an escalation that risks civilian lives and cultural heritage.

📌 Thailand’s Justification

  • Thai officials claim the airstrikes are defensive, launched after Cambodian forces allegedly planted landmines and attacked Thai positions.
  • The Thai Prime Minister stated operations would continue “as necessary to defend the country and protect public safety”.
  • Bangkok frames the strikes as part of protecting the Gulf of Thailand and securing disputed border zones.

⚠️ Criticism and Concerns

  • Cambodia’s position: Phnom Penh accuses Thailand of aggression, saying the strikes deliberately hit civilian areas, including shelters for displaced people and infrastructure in Siem Reap province.
  • Civilian casualties: Reports confirm at least five civilians killed in early strikes, with the toll rising to around 20–25 overall.
  • Imbalance of power: Cambodia has no modern airpower, relying on ground forces, making Thailand’s use of fighter jets a one‑sided escalation.
  • International reaction: Observers warn the strikes undermine ceasefire efforts and risk turning border clashes into full‑scale war.

✨ Assessment

  • Legally and ethically, Thailand’s justification is contested. While states have the right to self‑defence, the scale and targets of the airstrikes—deep inside Cambodian territory, near civilian shelters and UNESCO heritage sites—raise serious proportionality concerns.
  • Strategically, airpower gives Thailand overwhelming dominance, but it risks international condemnation and long‑term instability.
  • Humanitarian impact: With over 800,000 Cambodians displaced, the strikes worsen a crisis that already threatens regional stability.

🔮 Outlook

Unless mediated by ASEAN or external powers, Thailand’s reliance on airpower is likely to prolong the conflict. Cambodia cannot respond in kind, meaning the imbalance will continue to fuel accusations of unjustified aggression.

Cambodia / Thailand conflict.

cambodia, homelessness, opinons, thoughts, photography, pictures, war

Yes, fighting between Thailand and Cambodia has escalated sharply in December 2025, with Thai airstrikes hitting deep inside Cambodian territory, including Siem Reap province near Angkor Wat. Cambodia accuses Thailand of targeting civilian areas and shelters for displaced people, while Thailand claims self‑defence in a long‑running border dispute. Casualties, displacement, and damage to infrastructure are mounting.

📌 Current Situation (as of mid‑December 2025)

  • Airstrikes reported: Cambodian officials say Thai F‑16 fighter jets dropped bombs in Oddar Meanchey and Siem Reap provinces, including near camps for displaced people and a bridge in Srei Snam district.
  • Tourist sites at risk: Siem Reap, home to Angkor Wat, Cambodia’s top tourist draw and a UNESCO World Heritage site, has been directly threatened by strikes.
  • Casualties & displacement: At least 20 people have been killed since fighting reignited, with hundreds of thousands displaced. Cambodia claims around 800,000 people have fled border areasThe Straits Times.
  • Border closures: Phnom Penh has shut all land crossings with Thailand to protect civilians.
  • Thai perspective: Bangkok says the strikes are defensive, part of operations to protect the Gulf of Thailand, and blames Cambodia for instigating attacks.

⚠️ Risks and Implications

  • Humanitarian crisis: Camps for displaced people are now under threat, worsening conditions for civilians already uprooted.
  • Tourism impact: Cambodia’s economy relies heavily on tourism, and strikes near Angkor Wat could devastate recovery efforts post‑COVID.
  • Regional instability: The conflict stems from colonial‑era border demarcation disputes, and repeated truces have failed.
  • International concern: Despite calls for a ceasefire—including from the US—bombing has continued, raising fears of escalation.

✨ Assessment

The Thailand–Cambodia border conflict has reignited into one of the most serious flare‑ups in years. The use of airstrikes deep inside Cambodian territory marks a dangerous escalation, threatening civilians, cultural heritage sites, and regional stability. Cambodia is militarily outgunned, relying on international pressure and diplomacy, while Thailand frames its actions as defensive.

In 2025, this conflict is not just about disputed territory—it is about national identity, economic survival, and the fragility of peace in Southeast Asia. The risk of further escalation remains high unless external mediation succeeds.

Reports from mid‑December 2025 confirm that Thai airstrikes have reached Siem Reap province itself, not just the border.

  • Targets hit: Cambodian officials say bombs struck Srei Snam district in Siem Reap, damaging a bridge and hitting areas near shelters for displaced people.
  • Proximity to Angkor Wat: While Angkor Wat itself has not been directly attacked, the strikes are within the same province, raising fears that Cambodia’s most important cultural and tourist site could be at risk.
  • Civilian impact: Camps for displaced people in Siem Reap province have been threatened, with Cambodia warning that tourist hotspots are now in danger.
  • Depth of strikes: This marks a significant escalation—airstrikes are no longer confined to border areas like Oddar Meanchey, but are penetrating deep into Cambodian territory, roughly 100 km from the Thai border.

At least 20 Cambodians have been reported killed in the renewed border clashes and Thai airstrikes since early December 2025, with hundreds of thousands displaced.

📌 Current Death Toll

  • Initial clashes (Dec 8–9, 2025): Reports confirmed around 10 deaths as fighting spread to new parts of the border.
  • Escalation (Dec 11–15, 2025): Heavy airstrikes and artillery attacks pushed the toll higher, with about two dozen killed in total.
  • Cambodian civilians: Casualties include civilians near shelters and bridges in Siem Reap province, as well as soldiers along the border.

⚠️ Humanitarian Impact

  • Displacement: Cambodia says over 800,000 people have fled border provinces, with camps now under threat from bombing.
  • Infrastructure damage: Bridges, shelters, and areas near Siem Reap have been hit, raising fears for Angkor Wat and tourism.
  • Civilian risk: Airstrikes penetrating deep into Cambodian territory mean non‑combatants are increasingly at risk.

✨ Assessment

The death toll in Cambodia stands at roughly 20–25 people as of mid‑December 2025, but numbers are likely to rise as fighting continues. The scale of displacement is far larger, creating a humanitarian crisis that threatens both civilian safety and Cambodia’s economic lifeline in Siem Reap.

Understanding Crowd Dynamics: The Importance of Safety in Public Spaces

cambodia, cameras, conflict, Lenses, opinons, thoughts, photography, pictures, public, street, Travel, voluntary, war

Public gatherings, demonstrations, and large events are a hallmark of a vibrant society, where people come together to celebrate, protest, or participate in communal activities. However, these gatherings can also present significant safety challenges, particularly when they involve large crowds, loud noises, and the potential for danger.

The science of crowd dynamics is a fascinating field that delves into the behavior of people in large groups. It draws from various disciplines, including psychology, sociology, and physics, to understand how individuals act within a crowd and how a crowd behaves as a collective entity. This knowledge is crucial for event organizers, law enforcement, and public safety officials to ensure the well-being of participants in crowded settings.

One of the key aspects of crowd dynamics is the concept of ‘social force,’ which describes how individuals in a crowd maintain a certain distance from each other, much like particles that repel one another. This invisible force helps prevent collisions and allows for the orderly movement of people. However, in high-density situations, such as a packed concert or a busy festival, this social force can break down, leading to dangerous scenarios where individuals are unable to move freely and may even be crushed by the pressure of the crowd around them.

The tragic events that have occurred in the past, such as the human pile-up in Seoul’s Itaewon district in 2022, highlight the devastating consequences that can arise when crowd safety is not adequately managed. These incidents underscore the need for comprehensive planning, crowd control measures, and emergency response strategies to prevent similar tragedies.

In addition to physical safety, the presence of loud noises, such as those from demonstrations or concerts, can also pose risks. Prolonged exposure to high decibel levels can lead to hearing damage, and the cacophony of a crowd can create confusion and panic during emergencies. Organizers need to consider noise control and communication methods to ensure messages can be clearly conveyed to attendees, even amidst the din of a bustling crowd.

Moreover, the potential for violence or dangerous situations, such as shootings, adds another layer of complexity to crowd management. Law enforcement and security personnel must be trained to respond effectively to such threats, balancing the need to neutralize danger with the imperative to avoid harming innocent bystanders. This delicate task requires not only tactical skill but also an understanding of crowd psychology and behaviour.

Ultimately, the study of crowd dynamics serves as a reminder of our shared responsibility to prioritize safety in public spaces. Whether attending a peaceful protest, a lively parade, or a dynamic concert, each individual plays a role in contributing to a safe and enjoyable experience for all. By staying informed, being aware of our surroundings, and respecting the space of others, we can help ensure that public gatherings remain a positive aspect of our communal life.

As we continue to gather in numbers, let us remember the lessons learned from past events and strive to create environments where safety and enjoyment go hand in hand. Together, we can celebrate the power of community while safeguarding the well-being of every participant. Let’s make every public gathering a testament to our ability to come together safely and harmoniously.

When a demonstration becomes angry, it’s crucial to prioritize safety and de-escalation. Here are some steps you can take:

  1. Assess the Situation: Quickly determine if the demonstration’s shift in mood is widespread or localized. Look for safe exits or areas where tensions are lower.
  2. Stay Calm: Your own calm demeanour can have a calming effect on others. Avoid any actions that could be perceived as provocative or disrespectful.
  3. Cease Provocative Actions: If you’re taking pictures, stop and assess whether your actions could inflame the situation. If there’s any chance they might be, it’s best to put the camera away.
  4. Follow Safety Protocols: If you’re part of an organized group, follow any pre-established safety protocols. If not, consider leaving the area if you feel unsafe.
  5. Listen and Observe: Try to understand the cause of the anger. Sometimes, acknowledging grievances can help de-escalate emotions.
  6. Seek Help if Necessary: If the situation feels beyond your control, look for law enforcement or demonstration organizers who can intervene and restore peace.

Remember, while documenting events is important, nothing is more valuable than your safety and those around you. If a demonstration turns angry, the best action is to prioritize de-escalation and safety.

The Quest for Impartiality in Journalism

cambodia, cameras, conflict, homelessness, opinons, thoughts, photography, pictures, public, sihanouk, street, voluntary, war


In the realm of journalism, impartiality is often hailed as a cornerstone of ethical reporting. It is the practice of providing a balanced view, free from personal bias, allowing the audience to form their own opinions based on a fair presentation of the facts. But how can journalists maintain impartiality, and is true impartiality even attainable?

The concept of impartiality in journalism is rooted in the idea that reporters should not favour any particular point of view, person, or group. Instead, they should present the news in an unbiased and even-handed manner. This means that journalists must rise above their personal perspectives to deliver comprehensive and authoritative coverage of news and current affairs.

To achieve impartiality, journalists are encouraged to reflect a wide range of opinions and explore conflicting views without letting their personal preferences influence the subject matter or choice of interviewees. They must be honest about personal interests or history that could affect their reporting and discuss potential conflicts of interest with senior editorial teams.

In the digital age, where information is abundant and media outlets are numerous, the challenge of maintaining impartiality has intensified. Audiences now have access to a wider range of views than ever before, and this has led some to question traditional approaches to impartiality that attempt to represent all points of view within a single broadcast or publication.

Despite these challenges, research indicates that engaged audiences still value impartiality and consider it a defining characteristic of news. They expect journalists to focus on facts, objectivity, and fairness, and to avoid opinions and bias in reporting. Impartiality remains a foundational value of news that underpins audiences’ trust and is essential for robust news coverage.

Journalistic objectivity, another term often associated with impartiality, suggests that stories should be reported neutrally, with journalists siding with none of the parties involved. This approach aims to provide all sides with relevant facts and information, allowing the audience to draw their own conclusions.

The ideal of impartiality consists of several elements, including accuracy, fairness, balance, disinterestedness, open-mindedness, and fidelity to news values. Breaking down the concept into these constituent elements makes it possible to assess coverage for impartiality and strive towards it, even if it remains a challenging ideal.

In conclusion, while absolute impartiality may be an impossible ideal, it is still a goal worth pursuing for journalists committed to ethical reporting. By adhering to the principles of impartiality and objectivity, journalists can provide their audience with the information necessary to make informed decisions, thereby upholding the integrity of the news industry and the trust of the public.

References:
: Media Helping Media – Impartiality in Journalism
: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism – Rethinking Impartiality for the Digital Age
: Wikipedia – Journalistic Objectivity
: SpringerLink – Impartiality: Attainable and Assessable